News
November 23, 2025
BJP criticises T.N. Deputy CM Udhayanidhi Stalin for calling Sanskrit a ‘dead language’
BJP spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia said that the DMK leader had “become synonymous with anarchy and division” and alleged that T.N. Deputy Chief Minister was “known for his hatred” for Hindus
**BJP Slams Tamil Nadu Deputy CM's 'Dead Language' Remark on Sanskrit**
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has strongly criticised Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin for his recent remarks referring to Sanskrit as a "dead language." The BJP's sharp rebuke comes amid heightened political tensions and accusations of anti-Hindu sentiment directed at the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader.
BJP spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia launched a scathing attack, claiming that Udhayanidhi Stalin has "become synonymous with anarchy and division." Bhatia further alleged that the Deputy Chief Minister is "known for his hatred" for Hindus, framing the Sanskrit comment as another instance of this perceived prejudice. The BJP's statement suggests that Stalin's remarks are not merely an academic observation about the language's usage but a deliberate attempt to denigrate Hindu culture and traditions.
The controversy revolves around the DMK leader's characterization of Sanskrit, an ancient Indo-Aryan language considered the liturgical language of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. While the active use of Sanskrit as a spoken language has significantly declined over centuries, it retains immense cultural and religious importance in India. It is widely used in Hindu rituals, scriptures, and classical literature.
The BJP's strong reaction highlights the sensitive nature of language politics in India, particularly concerning languages closely associated with religious and cultural identities. The party's criticism suggests a broader concern about the DMK's stance on Hindu traditions and its potential impact on social harmony. This incident is likely to further fuel the ongoing political discourse surrounding language, religion, and cultural identity in Tamil Nadu and across the nation. The DMK has yet to officially respond to the BJP's accusations, and the implications of this controversy remain to be seen. This verbal clash adds another layer of complexity to the already fraught relationship between the BJP and the DMK, particularly in the lead-up to upcoming elections.
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has strongly criticised Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin for his recent remarks referring to Sanskrit as a "dead language." The BJP's sharp rebuke comes amid heightened political tensions and accusations of anti-Hindu sentiment directed at the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader.
BJP spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia launched a scathing attack, claiming that Udhayanidhi Stalin has "become synonymous with anarchy and division." Bhatia further alleged that the Deputy Chief Minister is "known for his hatred" for Hindus, framing the Sanskrit comment as another instance of this perceived prejudice. The BJP's statement suggests that Stalin's remarks are not merely an academic observation about the language's usage but a deliberate attempt to denigrate Hindu culture and traditions.
The controversy revolves around the DMK leader's characterization of Sanskrit, an ancient Indo-Aryan language considered the liturgical language of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. While the active use of Sanskrit as a spoken language has significantly declined over centuries, it retains immense cultural and religious importance in India. It is widely used in Hindu rituals, scriptures, and classical literature.
The BJP's strong reaction highlights the sensitive nature of language politics in India, particularly concerning languages closely associated with religious and cultural identities. The party's criticism suggests a broader concern about the DMK's stance on Hindu traditions and its potential impact on social harmony. This incident is likely to further fuel the ongoing political discourse surrounding language, religion, and cultural identity in Tamil Nadu and across the nation. The DMK has yet to officially respond to the BJP's accusations, and the implications of this controversy remain to be seen. This verbal clash adds another layer of complexity to the already fraught relationship between the BJP and the DMK, particularly in the lead-up to upcoming elections.
Category:
Politics