News
November 17, 2025
Prime Minister Karki faces contempt of court petition over ambassador recall
Advocate demands punishment for ignoring Supreme Court order.
Kathmandu - Prime Minister Karki is facing a contempt of court petition filed by a prominent advocate, alleging that the Prime Minister's office deliberately ignored a Supreme Court order regarding the recall of an ambassador. The petition, lodged earlier today, seeks to hold Prime Minister Karki accountable for what the advocate claims is a blatant disregard for the judiciary's authority.
The core of the issue revolves around a recent decision by the Karki administration to recall a Nepalese ambassador stationed abroad. Following the recall order, the ambassador filed a writ petition with the Supreme Court, arguing that the decision was unlawful and politically motivated. The Supreme Court subsequently issued a stay order, preventing the government from proceeding with the recall until the court could hear the case in full and deliver a final verdict.
According to the contempt of court petition, Prime Minister Karki and his office knowingly and willfully disobeyed the Supreme Court's stay order. The advocate argues that despite being fully aware of the court's directive, the government continued to pursue the ambassador's recall, effectively undermining the authority of the Supreme Court and setting a dangerous precedent for the rule of law in Nepal.
The petition demands that the Supreme Court initiate contempt of court proceedings against Prime Minister Karki and impose appropriate penalties for his alleged defiance. These penalties could range from fines to imprisonment, depending on the court's assessment of the severity of the contempt.
This development throws a wrench into the already complex political landscape of Nepal. The allegations of contempt come at a sensitive time, as the Karki administration grapples with numerous challenges, including economic instability and ongoing political negotiations.
Legal experts believe that the Supreme Court will take the petition very seriously. Contempt of court is a grave matter, designed to protect the integrity and independence of the judiciary. If proven, the allegations could have serious ramifications for Prime Minister Karki's political career and the stability of the government. The case is expected to draw significant public attention and could potentially trigger a constitutional crisis, further straining the relationship between the executive and judicial branches of the government. The Supreme Court is yet to schedule a hearing date for the contempt petition.
The core of the issue revolves around a recent decision by the Karki administration to recall a Nepalese ambassador stationed abroad. Following the recall order, the ambassador filed a writ petition with the Supreme Court, arguing that the decision was unlawful and politically motivated. The Supreme Court subsequently issued a stay order, preventing the government from proceeding with the recall until the court could hear the case in full and deliver a final verdict.
According to the contempt of court petition, Prime Minister Karki and his office knowingly and willfully disobeyed the Supreme Court's stay order. The advocate argues that despite being fully aware of the court's directive, the government continued to pursue the ambassador's recall, effectively undermining the authority of the Supreme Court and setting a dangerous precedent for the rule of law in Nepal.
The petition demands that the Supreme Court initiate contempt of court proceedings against Prime Minister Karki and impose appropriate penalties for his alleged defiance. These penalties could range from fines to imprisonment, depending on the court's assessment of the severity of the contempt.
This development throws a wrench into the already complex political landscape of Nepal. The allegations of contempt come at a sensitive time, as the Karki administration grapples with numerous challenges, including economic instability and ongoing political negotiations.
Legal experts believe that the Supreme Court will take the petition very seriously. Contempt of court is a grave matter, designed to protect the integrity and independence of the judiciary. If proven, the allegations could have serious ramifications for Prime Minister Karki's political career and the stability of the government. The case is expected to draw significant public attention and could potentially trigger a constitutional crisis, further straining the relationship between the executive and judicial branches of the government. The Supreme Court is yet to schedule a hearing date for the contempt petition.
Category:
Politics